Swingline Stapler Essay Example for Free

Swingline Stapler EssayThe Swingline Heavy Duty Stapler is an office supply, more so than a household item. A casual attempt to purchase a heavy province stapler online (e.g., virago or eBay) makes it clear that there are numerous sellers of this product other than Swingline. Names like Stanley Bostitch, Sparco, subject Pro, Hunt, Arrow, and Rapid, to name a few and this list doesnt include the models offered by the brick-and-mortar retailers like major power Max, Office Depot, and Staples. A more extensive search would only add to the list. Searching by brand inwardly any of these online sites, however, pretty consistently reveals Swingline as the brand with the most choices and more often than not, Stanley Bostitch falls into blurb on the list by product count. This anecdotal evidence hints that collectively, Swingline and Stanley Bostitch may very well crap a strong share of a crowded market oligopoly or monopolistic opposition it could go either way.Page 2In terms o f establishing the footing for its heavy duty stapler, it is important to Swingline to price it reasonably close to its many substitutes. The competitors for this product provide a range of prices that serve as a boundary for Swingline to use in determining the price for its product a feature of monopolistic competition. base on the brand listing information, I would expect that a major competitor, Bostitch, is the one that Swingline pays most direction to Swinglines pricing decisions are somewhat dependent on the expected response of Bostitch. This is a symptomatic of an oligopoly.In one sense, it displace be argued that a heavy duty stapler is a regularise product it serves one function. Due to this, there is not a significant amount of advertising do to try to differentiate the Swingline Heavy Duty Stapler from its competitors. Sellers in monopolistic competition and oligopoly both drive to point out product differences, but standardized products exist primarily in oli gopoly and perfect competition so, in this regard, oligopoly seems to be the correct fit.On the other hand, attempts are made to give us the acquaintance that the heavy duty staplers are indeed different. Paper Pro, for example, tells us this about one of their models Patented unequalled staple-driving engineering provides the power to drive a staple through up to 65 sheets of paper with the insistence of just two fingers. Yet a different Paper Pro brand tells us 80% Easier than other heavy duty staplers. Not to be outdone, Swingline counters with a pitch for its complementary product 70 sheet staple capacity with Swingline Optima High Capacity staples. Add different sizes, shapes, and colors, and a case can be made for product differentiation. This would seem to bring monopolistic competition back into the mix.Finally, on the surface, it seems that barriers to first appearance would be minimal. The production of a stapler does not require a high level of technology or a signific ant amount of financial capital. For a new seller to successfully cut through the existing market, however, it seems they would need to have a price advantage due to the relatively standardized temperament of the product. The ability of Swingline and Stanley Bostitch to match any new competitors sale price could effectively strangulate entry into this market. Based on this criterion, a case can be made for both monopolistic competition and oligopoly.In conclusion, it seems that characteristics of both monopolistic competition and oligopoly are present. This would put the market for heavy duty staplers somewhere in the middle of the competitive continuum perhaps some oligopoly-type behavior by Swingline and Stanley Bostitch, but more like monopolistic competition overall. Given what I perceive to be as an inability to fool a positive economic profit over time, Ill hang my hat on monopolistic competition.