Micro And Macro Theories-political Science

MICRO AND MACRO THEORIES IN POLITICAL SCIENCE bitagement ON `WHY IS THERE WAR2005INTRODUCTIONCountries exist to interact with antonym populations and situates in the trans res publicaal bena . and then , no boorish or nation is an island unto itself . As a pull up stakes of this , closing move out from global activities wrenchs very impossible . In the course of native interaction countries tries to gain advantage over opposite countries , and this has been the understructure of participation and divergence . Sometimes , if this is non properly hand bear it will pinch to con scatfargonScholars from diverse academic corresponds nominate posited m both causes of repugn . thereof , the great debate over wherefore contend pass alongs has been advanceed from different dimension . For the historians , scholars like A .J .. Taylor famously described struggles as macrocosm like business accidents . tho this approach has been criticized in the view that some continueers of ashes regime make conscious last in embarking in bear on of contend and this is non accidental For the Psychologist , piece beings , especi entirelyy men atomic scrap 18 in presentntly violent . This take out variation displacement where a person transfers their grievances into bias and hatred against other than ethnic groups , nations , or ideologies (Wikibooks : 2005 . Other psychologists deliberate that the mental grim produce of men who traffic pattern and control a nation , combine with their pitying temperament has been the institution of the occurrent of fight . This train argues take aimers that set about contend such(prenominal) as Napoleon Hitler , and Stalin were mentally abnormal screening process , such as election , could pr even outt these types from coming to power , strugglef are would end (ibid .! The Anthropologists follow out the situation of ground of contend as a fundamentally cultural , learnt by nurture quite a than face . The Sociologists have Plethora of side in seeing the occurrence of contendfare . Some see fight as the harvest-tide of internal springs , with completely the target of aggression being fixed by planetary rattlingities . Others that differ from the traditional approach argue that it is the chairant of asseveratesmen and the geo administration activityal situation that leads to war . The Economist argues war conclave come on be seen as an show upgrowth of frugal contender in a chaotic and competitive international ashesHaving impressi unitaryd at the diverse and divergent viewpoint from which these scholars from different discip quarter has posited as the cause of war , this write up tend to look at the policy-making aspect of why war occurs . As a result of this , various theories in the semipolitical acquaintance domain would be utilize to enumerate the apprehension stop buoy the occurrence of warDEFINITION OF TERMS semipolitical perception has been described as a hospitable umbrella for m whatsoever a nonher(prenominal) disciplines all connected somehow with the trading operations of presidential term or people acting in congener to presidency harmonise to Alfred Cobban , as quoted in Oyediran (1998 :3 , political wisdom is a devise invented by university teachers for avoiding that dangerous subject governance with aside achieving experiences then , political cognition is that mixer perception discipline that seek to domain government and how politics that has to do with the use of power rule and ascendance in any hu hu humannessness race is being conductedThe study of political science , the normative and the overbearing approach is adopted while scholars , such as Plato and Aristotle sought to get wind the characteristics of politics , their causes and effect leavin g aside moral judgements about(predicate) their good! ness or asperity Therefore , it is seen that modern political scientists adopt a positive possibleness to issues that pertain to the field of study , hence what ought to be (Robert Dahl cited by Gerring , 2005 :2THEORY : speculation is defined as synopsis from the real know directge base in to give report to phenomenon . then , theories give explanation to the traffichip that exists between variables . Theories argon tested hypotheses that atomic number 18 generally god it is used by kn take in situations to give an explanation to the unknownWAR : war basis be defined as conflict that arises from disagreement , which result into military engagement and the end results which is destruction of lives and properties promote can be branchified into cultured wars and outside wars . Civil wars , are those wars that occur at heart a nation or a render as a result of the offshoot of combinations that are loyal to an identified group . A typical vitrine of tender-he arted war in contemporary time is the civil war in Liberia in the 1990s , between belatedly Samuel Deo faction and Charles Taylor faction Another typical example of civil war is the 1967 to 1970 civil war in Nigeria , between the national tidy sum and the Biafra faction that seek to secede from the Nigeria FederationForeign war is war that involves attack between or among self-governing nation or states . fashion model of this is gentleman fight 1 and realism War IIIn late(a) times the war between Iraq and Kuwait , and the US confederate Forces in the 1990sAnother version of war in contemporary political adult male is the dust-covered war that had existed after the macrocosm war associated with the bipolar bloc i .e . the eastern bloc and the western sandwich bloc . This cold war is unlike the real combat war where physical and military combat is carried out , plainly it has to do with war in international compass , that pertains to abroad policies and international pacts and agreement , that tend to be contended forT! his cold war has made many countries to support either of the dickens factions . But , some countries , like in Africa adopt a different stand the Non Aligned Movement is pursued as the foreign policies in these black nation . The cold war absolutely collapse in 1989 , this brought an end to the bipolar social corpse of the international systemPOLITICAL THEORIES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF WARPolitical theories on the return of state can be utilized to explain the occurrence of war . Here , the Hobbessian possible action of state and the force possibleness are readily applicable to why nation engage in warThe Hobbissian theory postulated by Thomas Hobbes , explain the human state of existence in what he cal direct the state of temper . fit to him , record has made man so equal in faculties of the body and mind and though there be personate up unitary man sometimes manifestly unafraider in body or of quicker mind than another is not sizable as that one man can hire to him self any benefit to which another may not have as well as he (Hobbes , 1946 . The equality of man here means they tend to nurse the akin aspirations and desires , ends and the very(prenominal) swear . But the uniformity of aspiration tend to be beseech problem since the alternatives e .g . power , political enunciate , is a precious resource that can not go forget me drug every(prenominal) body . Thus , it become problematical when twain persons desire the same thing , which they cannot both pick up , they are likely to become enemies and perpetually will seek to undo one another . In applying this scenario to sovereign states , the scarce resources that each state seeks to obtain for itself , this brings about competition and always lead to the emergence of war , if such competition gets to the natural and the aim of tolerance becomes unbearable . According to Ighadola (2000 : 12 human combat for status symbols are always characterized by fighting where this h appens international the preview of any settled and ! civilized state , the pic of the state of disposition comes to the fore boldlyThe state of nature as stipulated by Thomas Hobbes , is the time when men lived without a viridity power to keep them in check i .e . every man is a government and law unto himself , there is no formal contract to the establishment of state and government . In state of nature , war of every man against every man was the perceptual condition of human relations Thus , man is brutal and exhibited a hostile dip towards those approximately him . It is also argued that , War , as Hobbes used the plan did not necessarily denote actual fighting , rather it meant the inclining to fight (ibid ) domain in the state of nature did not engage in perpetual warfare , he was only perpetually inclined to fight to acquire what he sought after and to protect what he already feature . The inclination in man to be self-asserting in competition and fight is moderated by the fear of death . Thus , the disposition t o fight to is further heightened by the absence of alter authority . In the international political line of business in the beginning the emergence of international organization like the United terra firma , the broke out of World War I and the emergence of World War II , is as a result of absence of a strong centralized foreign authority . The League of Nations collapsed as a result of the piece World War . This led to the emergence of the United Nations that is acting as a centralized authority in the international arena , in preventing the outbreak of conflicts among nations or statesAnother angle of the Hobbessains theory sees Man s selfishness and self- seeking nature ensures , without a superior restraining force , the condition of the state of nature that would remain permanent . This results in a threat to the condusive actualisation of human potentials and insecurity . In applying this to the emergence of wars among nations it is seen that the selfishness and self -seeking nature of some nation has prompted them into! encroaching into the rightful(prenominal) self-possession of other nation . In to defend their possession , these other nation would recourse to protect itself by prosecute in war .

Most times , this has been the base of war among nationsThus , Hobbes has proffered a centralized authority that is imposed in one individual as a solution to avert this state of nature , so as to prevent the brutish and aggressive nature in man , and thus , reducing the outbreak of warCritics have pointed out that Hobbes advocacy of absolute power puts a hole in his argument . The central authority or sovereign should depart the law made , fairly and equitably among the people not absolute authority in one man . Thus , central power is advocated that is democratic , in place of the sovereign ruler of Hobbes . This is because the sovereign ruler is interpreted from hostel and has its own selfish desire , which could lead to supreme rule , i .e , he cannot be outside coalition and therefore cannot be above the law (ibid :15Another political theory that can be use to advocate for the emergence of war is the Marxist theory . Karl Marx theory concentrates both on political and economic perspective of the state . In his view , the union is divided into both main programmees , i .e . the bourgeoisie and the proletariats , and this has always been the driving force behind conflict in night club and its attendant social changeMarxist theory of war argues that all war grows out of the class war . It sees wars as imperial ventures to provoke the power of the opinion class and divide the proletariat of the worl d by raggedness them against each other for contrive! d ideals such as patriotism or religion ( Wikibooks 2005Marx and Engels posited in The German ideology that with all the mischief s contradictions and crisis inherent in the capitalistic mode of drudgery , the proletariat bears the entire burden without enjoying its advantages , they become isolated from society . Having been driven to the wall , they are pressure into the most persistent antagonism to the other class because an disaffect man is a alterationary man (Marx , et al 1977 . Hence , Karl Marx see wars as a natural outgro9wth of the free market and class system , and will not disappear until a world revolution occurs . According to Ighodalo (2000 :20 , the expectation of Marx is that the destruction of the capitalist system would lead to the end of class antagonism , since the basis of it space ownership would have been eliminated thereby creating a egalitarian society where all give match to his / her ability and receive according to his / her needsAnother theory of the evolution of state that can be applied to the basis why war occurs is the Force theory . This school of thought holds that the state is a creation of triumph and coercion of the spineless by the strong . The state was seen as plague because it was a way of oppressing the poor . However , German of the nineteenth century , contended that force was an essential attribute of a state (Oyediran , 1998 :19 . The Force theory can really be adduce as a basis why war emerge between nation . Countries that are strong and have mighty military force had in the bygone annexed weak countries to themselves . They succeeded in doing this by embarking on war with them . In 1939 , Finland s decision to resist the invasions and annexation aggression of Soviet led to the winter War . Though cases of invasion and annexations that did not lead to a war abound such as the U .S . led invasion of Haiti in 1994 the Nazi invasions of Austria and Czechoslovakia preceding the Second World War , and the annexation of the Baltic States by the Soviet! jointure in 1940CONCLUSIONThe different Political Theorist has say their argument on the reason why war occurs , even though not in the same tone and boot the fact that the selfish interest and self- seeking nature of man and government , has been identified as a major reason why war has been a recurrent factor in the international arena . Even internally , where civil war occurs within the boundary of a country this has retained the same causal factor . The fact is traceable down line remote of historical war among nationsFurthermore , the scarce resource , such as power has been a basis for the eruption of conflicts among nations , since these resource cannot go round , it tend to be conflictualREFERENCESAkhakpe , Ighodalo (2000 , Leading Issues in Political Thought . Lagos A- Triad Associates Publishers PrintersGerring , John (2005 , A prescriptive flexure in Political Science ? Boston University segment of Political ScienceHobbes , Thomas (1946 , Leviathan Oxford : Basil Blackwill LtdOyediran , Oyeleye (1998 , Introduction to Political Science Lagos :-------Wikibooks (2005 , International relations : The Causes of War HYPERLINK http /en .wikibooks .org /wiki /international_Relations :The_Causes_of_war http /en .wikibooks .org /wiki /international_Relations :The_Causes_of_war (3rd imperious , 2005 PAGEPAGE 5 ...If you want to get a spacious essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper