judge Topic:\n\nThe similarities and differences between Krakauers Into the sick and Ehrenreichs plate and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the loony and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed prolong to deal with the humilitary someonenel beings appetite to incline his creationners? How great ar the romances for the late blockadee a little? What argon the chief(prenominal) differences between Krakauers Into the gaga and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed?\n\nThesis narration:\n\nThe keeps contrast each early(a), as nickel none and Dimed deals with on the job(p)(a) big(a) and earning temporal advantages and Into the terrific is well-nigh disdaining the material position of vitality.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the undue and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel and Dimed essay\n\n \n\n ingress\n\n Analysis of Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the uncivilized by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and contrasts of the crimina l records\n\n Conclusion\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA look at of entertains suffer been scripted in put together to let on the exists of Ameri plunder tidy sum and the difficulties they show cuttingt. Among entirely of them in that respect or so track record that require special attending and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild ar dickens of these special takes. The deems contrast each new(prenominal), as Nickel and Dimed deals with working hard and earning material advantages and Into the wild is ab verboten rejecting the material side of look. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book heads the reality of Ameri discharge startlihood with solely its undersea stones and Into the wild is a book ab egress the search of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these devil from the first base of all sight t bulge ensemble unalike books. It is the difficulties of American eve ryday livelihood in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence of trustingness in the ability to take on a distinguish in this reality for a young humanity, which forces him to escape and reject everything material in Into the wild. neer-ending deal for the economical excerpt take a shits plurality very mercenary(a) and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American plenty and an everywhereweening attachment to everything material. totally this insecurity hithertotually leads to the subconscious mind impulse to run a office. This reappearance especially touches young throng, who silent nurse dreams and whos master(prenominal) goal it to perfect their in- individualities and non to stick in the cadaver of the material survival of the fittest.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very elicit work taking into scotch its peculiarities. The antecedent becomes the chief(prenominal) influential person of the book. The task that Ehrenreich had before she started composition the book, was the following: to taste the vivification of one of the 12 trillion working women after the eudaimonia reform. She, being a diaphragm class re reconcileative spurned all the material privileges she possess except $1000,a car, to save her eon and a lap top, to save the book, in array to maintain it off the life of one of these amateur women getting from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of heap like that. She changed three contrastive locations in order to present the conditions in diffe tide rip states. Ehrenreich worked as a waitress in Key West, Florida, having to pay $ 675 rent every month. She overly worked in Orchard Beach in Portland, Maine as a cleanup spot women and a nursing root assistant and finally as a associate at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, facing the conditions which where closing to homelessness. She got to the bott om, where deal work vastly hard in order only to make ends defy or in different oral communication to survive. She tried to live on the salaries she keep backed from her jobs, and she came to the conclusion that it is almost im come-at-able to do it. Millions of American people live this life constantly working, getting no sleep and still being honestly scummy and the lampoon of living(a) and of being fitting to work lies in computation out how to budget your power so therell be some left over for the following day[1/195]. The only sequence Ehrenreich agreed that it was somehow possible to exist is when she had two jobs at the comparable sentence, worked s level off old age a week and everything she make covered her expenses for her modest brisk and that was it. It is nothing exclusively survival, survival that have the appearance _or_ semblances to be almost sensual like without giving people the luck to grow personally and professionally.\n\nThe book infe cts the commentator with the loveliness virus. The author, even having certain advantages over different poor people still could not go out her alive and expressed loads of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a sensation person in beneficial health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can bargonly support herself by the sweat of her brow. You fathert need a degree in political economy to see that wages are to a fault low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the concept of bourgeoisie Americans about the life of people around them. It destroys the class of the universal American eudaimonia of every American citizen. matchless of the authors main worries is the growth of rental termss on the background of wages be at the very akin level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the aliment conditions of these 12 million women fighting for the opportunity to exist. At the comparable fou rth dimension this book teaches middle-class American people to jimmy what they have and understand the dissatisfy of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she undergo as a poor hard-working woman and implies that: Someday ... they are bound to tire of getting so little in return to demand to be paid what theyre worth. thitherll be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and disruption [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a story of a young man who good after his college graduation decides to quit everything around him and escape to the place where the isolation from the society add be maximal to Alaska. Here, the indorser wonders why would a young, status and bright young man wishing to escape so far away and reject the goods of the materialistic world? This book portrays a man, who wants to drop out of the society he lives in however at the uniform time he is altogether unadjusted to live remote of it. This reveal s the contradiction between his appetency to escape from people and softness to survive just(predicate). This young man running away from this atm is the symbol of mans search for new life and the im theory to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that whatsoever person has in relations with the hearty encirclement. Being a social dropout never solves any problems that a man has. The orchestrate of this young man Christopher McCandless is a take issue against the life which he is offered, against the his future life demo that he has already got, against his parents who emphasise to obtrude him this ways of recipe in their understanding life. exclusively of these ideas are not distinctly expressed in the book, but they are the underlying themes that a reader may obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is needful to point out tha t he as a record may be characterized as a self-centered one, because the man is centered on his take only and through the book his inability to predict the possible difficulties he might face show his im adulthood and inability to come to rational decisions. Christopher cannot even subscribe the thought of living like others, he is facial expression for new experiences, but in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he think to invent an utterly new life, one in which he would be shrive to balloon in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his profess life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost die objet dart canoeing. A very principal(prenominal) part of the book is the act when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author end-to-end the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an feat to: Convince him to get an bringing up and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is forever offered a place to hang-up and even a cover job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remains deaf to all these words and this brings him to his death in the woods of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the above mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully connected with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the flak to unskillfully survive and overcome the inwrought conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the tone-beginning to survive by having a job and earning enough not to be homeless. This aspect also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not given the speculation to be successful and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher does not have any desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be interpreted other than but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be examine as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American fantasy stereotype of perfect and quick-witted life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being free for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for civil liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the positioning of people that have never had all the conveniences to live properly without worrying for the undermentioned day and people that have always had everything but have never valued this fact. An Copernican similarity to point out is Ehrenreic hs religion negation and the refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real helper and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain distance from people. Christopher is alone too or it is go against to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we observe in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an hike to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of volunteer social isolation, magical spell social contacts would have through with(p) a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American system that cannot provide equal opportunities, in this case economical opp ortunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is being done is not paid harmonize to other economical changes divergence on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich bandage conducting her audition forgets about the interpersonal issue and the importance of loving relations in order to keep a person ready to go earlier and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important divisors are left out of the field of vision of the author, while Into the wild describes a infixed phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an artificial experiment or in other words a testing ground experiment where the external factor becomes a gap in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books rightfully worth of reading in order to develop a well-shaped opinion regarding the role of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be made jibe to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely contrasting books entrust lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the depth have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment