Congestion Charging Essay

Resolving Londons station problems was the highest priority of the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone. His goal was to create a world-class transport system that would advance origin efficiency, supports greater economic prosperity and improves the quality of life for every one living in London or visiting London.The Mayors transport strategy, which was published on 10 July 2001, it had ten key priorities* Reducing employment congestion* Rising money for underground investment* Rising money for radical improvements to bus services across London* Better integration of the National Rail system with Londons former(a) transport systems* increase the capacity of Londons transport system* Improving journey time reliability for railcar users* Supporting local transport initiatives* Making the diffusion of goods and services in London more reliable and efficient* Improving the accessibility of Londons transport system* Bringing forward parvenue integration initiatives.What is Congestion Charges?* Congestion charging is a modality of ensuring that those using valuable and crowded road space make a financial contribution.* It encourages the use of other modes of transport and is besides intended to ensure that, for those who have to use the roads, journey times are quicker and more reliable.* This scheme requires drivers to soften 5 per day if they wish to continue driving in central London.Tube stationWide line zone ring roadJam Cam see what the avocation is likeCharging zone areaParkingTrain stationRiver servicesThis map shows all the areas that are affected by congestion charges. By looking at at the map you can see all of central London zone 1 and zone 2 has being affected, so anyone living in spite of appearance that area would have to pay the congestion charge to travel to their local area or outside the congestion zones. emolument and disadvantage of congestion chargingAdvantage* Reduce congestion* Reduce through traffic* Further encourage use of publ ic transport in central London* Benefit business efficiency by speeding up the movement of goods and people* Create a better environment for walking and cyclingDisadvantageo business may increase on orbital routes by up to 5%o Traffic would be reduced on radial routes by 5 10%o Overall reduction in traffic by 1 2%o London scheme could simply make traffic worse elsewhereo Will hit disadvantaged hardesto The scheme had no pilot scheme to test the effectiveness of congestion chargeso It will take months to establish whether it is a successConclusionCongetion charges has it adavantages and disavantages an asthmatic would would totally spport congestion charges, as pollution caused by cars is a factor of asthame. It is also a class question. Those who can afford to have moved, those who cant have to stay and choke. If congestion charges take back them and thier families a chance to breathe then(prenominal) I would fully support it.However, they need to be part of a plan aimed at enh ancing the environment and improving the quality of life. This could include cheaper public transport and improvements in its quality, safety and reliability more nurseries and play schools nearer to where people live, more on-line shopping, local markets and food co-ops, reduced hours with no loss of pay repopulating city centres and the countryside, more home working and home schooling a guaranteed in pass dispatch to give parents the option of being full time carers offering those willing to give up their car free bikes or public transport.But thither is also an agrument about Who is prepared to pay 10 a day, 50 a week, or 3,500 a year for congestion charging and 2,000 for workplace parkingwhich is 6,000 of taxed incomefor the privilege of bringing their car into London? It is the riche man ie stockborker, banker, law ect who wants to come in from Surbiton to the City of London. Their would not mind the charges. thier puts them down to they companies and it pays the 5,000 or 10, 000 a year. Who cares anyway? He will just say, Thats great, thank you very much. I believe It is a fat cats charter.What about people on a low wage, old people, young mothers who are dependent on their motor car not only in London but throughout the nation? To those people, 5,000 or 10,000 a year is a lot. What I want to know is this. What consultations has the get party had with groups of disabled people? What consultations has it had with the unions in regard to low wage earners? What consultations has it had with old peoplepeople who need their motor cars, and who will be taxed off the road if the charges are to work? If the Government say that is not their intention, and that such people will not be taxed off the road, I put it to them that there is no chance that their congestion charge will work.It is certain that the fat cats will not be taxed off the road. If the Government find a way of allowing housewives, young mothers, disabled people or members of the other categories to stay on the road, the amount of congestion will not be reduced, and all that we shall have is a revenue raiser for the mayor.